Voting on Narodna square (document)  12 April 2013 13:05  12733544 034188
Voting on Narodna square (document)

While the discussion about intentions to reconstruct Narodna square continues, we believe that the community "must know their heroes."

That's why we present the readers of the minutes of the meeting of the Architectural and Urban Development Council at the Department of Urban Development and Architecture of the Transcarpathian Regional State Administration.

We believe that the most interesting part of the document is the information on the voting by the council members.

Let's analyze votes "for" and "against." As you can see, architects and intellectuals - namely, respected architects Astalosh, Bahriy, architect and artist Kuzma and art historian Syrokhman - voted against the reconstruction.   

The Head of the Transcarpathian "architectural" union Hanzel only partially supported the project. So, whose voices helped to obtain what advocates of the reconstruction consider as the "approval"?

So here are the top four - Pihulyak, Borshovsky, Nikitin and Strychyk - the staff of the council (ie, the Department of Architecture and Urban Development).   The remaining votes for dubious Pavley's project were given by representatives of "competent" services, such as environmentalists, firefighters, epidemiologists, etc. 

Voting on Narodna square (document) (arhrada1)
Voting on Narodna square (document) (arhrada2)
Voting on Narodna square (document) (arhrada3)

Подібну копію документу оприлюднили і в групі «Архітектура міста Ужгород» на Фейсбук

Voting on Narodna square (document) (арх-ра)

Read also

Post comment

Users posting offensive comments as to other participants of discussion will be banned by moderator without prior warning or explanation. The information related to these users may be provided to law enforcement authorities upon relevant request.Links and advertising messages are prohibited in the comments!

No comments